AKIF SHOAIB versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, KARACHI
Sections 3, 6, 9 and 12 of the Control of the Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application in which the arrest of drug addicts and the punishment of the accused in a foreign country was sentenced to Pakistan, The arrested persons were tried on charges of possessing heroin in different quantities and sentenced to life imprisonment in Sri Lanka and sent back to Pakistan for sentencing. The conviction of the perpetrators was that they had already given maximum punishment in which they could be imposed. Pakistan, if they were arrested, would have been charged and a similar crime would have been tried in Pakistan, so that in order to benefit from such transfer, there would have to be a mutual exchange agreement between criminals between Pakistan and Sri Lanka, Those who were present and the offenders, who were tried in one country, can be transferred to another country regardless of the rest of the sentence, the crime and the conviction of a criminal in the convicted country. That Pakistan, which had been exchanged under bilateral arrangements, was entitled to punish such an offender who was in Pakistan. According to Vanin, the relevance of the sentence can only be decided and the imposition of imprisonment on any offender who was transferred to Pakistan, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in Pakistan under the Transfer Ordinance 2002. Was to be done under the laws of Pakistan. And if the period of imprisonment for a criminal who could be transferred to Pakistan by a country that signed a bilateral agreement for transfer of the offender through that country, then he
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
