Sections 302, 506 (2) and 34 QTL EMD, criminal threatening. The danger of causing death or serious injury, the testimony of several individuals in the joint intention offer, the testimony of the suspect, the witnesses confirmed the suspect's involvement in a murder case and later reported acquittal The deceased's father expressed his ignorance of the general and circumstantial evidence was full of contradictions, the death penalty cases should have come from an unforgivable source, which in the present case was lacking only as a victim's witness. Were attached and no evidence was produced by the prosecution. The body of the victim was not found and the chemical inspector's report was not submitted to prove that the blood contained in the blood of stained human beings. A chemical examiner / ballistic expert recovered from the accused was not sent to the accused, the accused charged with the commission of the crime. Evidence presented by interested intellect cannot be prosecuted nesses Appeal was allowed, convictions and convictions were set aside and they were acquitted.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
