MUHAMMAD IQBAL KAMDAR versus MUHAMMAD TAHIR AHMADANI
Section 39 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1975), Application for Interim Disciplinary Relief for the Compulsion of Section 3 Documents The High Court of Appeals Claims to Cancel Cases filed, suit property eviction proceedings and sale contract The plaintiff had also filed a petition against the single judge of the High Court for relief of the property in respect of the trial property, refusing to grant interim relief to the plaintiff. Yes, it filed a High Court appeal The plaintiff's complaint was that the suit property was sold at a higher price. Which was represented and thus he had been deprived of part of its section \ 's, the plaintiff's complaint was that it should not be sold to the plaintiff to the suit property. The suit was neither owned nor owned by the property. He had no interest in, nor participated in, any claim that he might be against the defendant, which was settled in the matter of contractual proceeding, namely, the three components - the preliminary matter, the balance of facility and irreparable loss. It must be present. The issue of temporary relief grant prima facie, the issue of grant of relief to the plaintiff by the plaintiff was not yet known, a matter cannot be decided yet when it can be decided when the evidence will be recorded in the case of the plaintiff. Failed to unfold. After there was no case for the provision of the required quality interim relief, the sole judge was justified in refusing to grant the said relief, forcing the order not to demand any interference, the appeal was dismissed, the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
