Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYOOB ALIAS AYOOB versus STATE

Section 497 bail, in the Council's grant for the accused, states that the 23 other co-accused were already admitted by the trial court before the bail and the accused's case was presented in a similar manner. Was assigned the role in which it was assigned. The FIR states that the other 23 accused have been confirmed by the State Council's statement of the accused's lawyer. And stated that he had no objection, if the rule of consistency was followed and the accused was also admitted on bail, the accused was also admitted in bail under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• J & P COATS LIMITED v. GOLDEN THREAD INDUSTRIES, through Proprietor 2011 CLD 811
• GULZAR v. State 2011 MLD 830
• NAEEM SHAMSHED v. State 2011 YLR 833
• ROYAL PVC (PVT.) LTD. v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS 2011 CLD 833
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL KAMDAR v. MUHAMMAD TAHIR AHMADANI 2011 MLD 835
• ALI HASSAN v. State 2011 YLR 846
• DOLLAR INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Abdullah Feroz v. NISAR TRADERS 2011 CLD 847
• ILYAS v. State 2011 MLD 849

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Ghizer lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes