ROYAL PVC (PVT.) LTD. versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
Sections 73 and 116 Trademark Rules, 2004, R68 The direct application of the trademark forum to the High Court scope petitioner to have the trademark registered in his name was the owner of the trademark and he has to cancel the trademark in the name of the respondents. The Directors filed in the High Court for the respondents were that the direct application to the High Court was not satisfactory. The remedy provided for under the law was the remedy for cancellation of the trademark. The request for the cancellation of the Registrar of Trademarks can only be transferred to the High Court under exceptional circumstances. The applicant had the authority under section 116. ? Trademark Ordinance, 2001, Appeal to either the High Court or the District Court or the Registrar If any trademark case or action is pending before the High Court or the District Court, the application may be filed in the High Court or may be the case. The district court could not move the petition directly to the High Court to cancel any trademark unless trademark questions were pending before the High Court, Rule 68 of the Trademark Rules 2004 Proper procedures and procedures for applying, canceling, and applying correction under Was provided, which included a specific form TM26 that was required to be filed by the person interested in the rejection. In addition to the trademark statement of the claim to which the application was made, the petition was dismissed in these circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
