The trial court applied for proceedings under Section 561A & 265K Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392, 395, 452, 120A, 34 and 109 of robbery, domestic crime and criminal conspiracy. , The defendants filed an application for cancellation of proceedings against them under Section 6161A, CCPC. The accused's lawyer admitted that all the witnesses had stated that the applicants in the court were not the same. And the main witnesses of the prosecution, who were also eyewitnesses to the crime, had acquitted the applicants of the crime. The lawyer further claimed that the accused had no chance of being convicted and were present before the trial. Continuing prosecution is unlikely to serve any useful purpose. The State Council did not legally contradict and stated that the applicants were not involved in the crime The actions against the applicants were, in the circumstances, canceled.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
