The defendant's denial, with his specific role in the FIR, was designated by the section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), section 395 / 337H (2) for a robber who was hurt by a stain or negligence. In which the complainant had no animosity or detachment from him. The delay in filing the FIR was explained, it was alleged that he was involved in several other similar cases and if he was released on bail, he is likely to repeat the same offense, if the accused alone. Registration of other FIs against the same cannot be considered. As a basis for denying his bail, but the attractiveness of the crime and other circumstances of the case also had to be taken into consideration while deciding on the bail case, the material available on record connected the accused with the commission of the crime. Was denied the circumstances in which the accused
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
