Find a Lawyer

NAHEED versus JAMIL AHMAD

O XXI, Rr 10 and 23 On the execution of an execution proceeding, the defendant filed an objection requesting him to examine his claim that he was the owner of the plot in the questioning record that he It was proved that the documents of the property on the subject were in favor of Hakul Holder Nazir. The court submitted in its report that the thematic layout was identified by the officials through a 1972 layout plan in which the intervening lawyer did not object to Nazir's report and claimed to have intervened on the subject. Was unfounded and their application was misunderstood. And dismissed, the court ordered Nazir to take physical possession of the subject of the execution proceedings, which had already been delimited. And give the physical possession of it to the ruler

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• NAEEM-UR-REHMAN v. State 2011 MLD 1257
• HAJAN v. State 2011 MLD 1263
• ABDUL HAQUE v. A.S.-I. SHER MUHAMMAD 2011 MLD 1270
• GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1273
• COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COS-IV, KARACHI v. SASI REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI 2011 PTD 1275
• SARMAD TUNIO v. State 2011 MLD 1279
• ANWAR ALI v. MAZHAR HUSSAIN HISBANI 2011 YLR 1279
• BASHIR AHMED v. AL-QADEER HOUSING PROJECT 2011 YLR 1282

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

family advocate from Mingora lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes