Articles 2 302 and ???e dawn, the disappearance of evidence of the crime or the reason for the screening offender to give false information, the benefit of the doubt is the explanation of the legal proceedings from the four-day delay in filing the prosecution Police did not report the missing son's missing to police. The victim was reportedly brought with him, but no evidence was presented for the last time, which the prosecution testified based on the evidence of the hearing, which led the witnesses to do nothing for the sole witness of the case. Run to safety or save the deceased from the accused while they were all involved in apprehending the accused, therefore, the confessional statement of the eyewitnesses cannot be trusted, the contradictions in the witness statements made the prosecution's case extremely suspicious. Crawl. The body was not affected by the suspect's identification The medical evidence contradicts the witness's statements and did not link the accused to the commission of the crime. Prosecutor failed to prove his case beyond the shadow of doubt, extending the suspect's benefit to the suspect. The High Court acquitted him of trial and conviction by a trial court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
