NAVEED AHMED KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Sections 32, 42 66, 78 (a), 79, 138 (a) and 140 of the Official Secrets Act (VIII of 1923), Sections 5 and 6 of Pakistan Prison Rules 1978, R2012 constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 (3) Constitution of Pakistan The petitioner's sentence and the sentence awarded by the General Court Marshal of the petitioner on the petition plea of the Naval Magistrate and the Pakistan Navy applicant are quite different from those of the Germans. According to the High Court's order, the lawyer who appealed to the court to appeal the appeal had resolved the appeal through his lawyer, the petitioner's lawyer was shown the proceedings of the General Court Marshal and to discuss the appeal. So he had plenty of time, but they failed to identify it. On the charge of espionage activities, the applicant suffered any weakness in the evidence or proceedings of the General Court of Martial Punishment; thus, he was not entitled to any general or special waiver. The applicant of the RJA Pakistan Jail Rules had pleaded guilty to all the allegations and accepted the High Court as true and true as there was no appellate court in the same case, which could not be reprinted on the evidence. No proof. And Article 199 (3) of the Constitution could not be entered into matters relating to Armed Forces under Article 199 (3) of the Constitution. Such punishment may be filed. The applicant may petition the Chief of Naval Staff for mercy. The High Court has dismissed the constitutional plea for failure. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
