SHAZIA AKBAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SINDH SECRETARIAT, KARACHI
Article 5 365 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 abduction, to persuade a woman to abduct or force marriage. The constitutional petition states the cancellation of an FIR applicant / alleged kidnapper that she has contracted with a co-accused, exercising her right to free will. And it was further stated that no one named in the FIR had abducted or abducted her and that she was living with a co-accused because his legally married wife was allegedly kidnapped. Also reported that his brother had lodged an FIR incorrectly. In his statement filed by the Investigating Officer on the direction of the court, the abduction of the applicant, which can be overcome, had reiterated the fact that he had not been abducted nor was he involved with the accused against his will. Was living The Advocate General had no objection, if the FIR was terminated, when the petitioner, who was the star witness of the crime, denied his position. The action, which the FIR dismissed, was referred to as a continuation of judicial proceedings in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
