Section 6 516 A superstar of a vehicle allegedly used for the commission of a crime court during any investigation or trial, may make such an order when it is appropriate for the property to be investigated or at the end of the trial. Would be appropriate for custody, when such property appeared. Used for the commission of any crime, or presented before any criminal court court, in general, the party was to restore possession of the vehicle from which the vehicle was stolen, however, the thief The buyer could not be superimposed on. The police was also entitled to the possession of a vehicle seized, especially in the absence of another legal claimant of such vehicle, the person whose original certificate of registration and other relevant documents were prepared. The person was shown to be the owner, all the original documents, including the register, were the applicant's right to take the vehicle into custody during the trial. The ration book, which reflects that the article was purchased from a leasing company. And after making all the installments, the same was regularly transferred in the name of the applicant, such vehicle was stripped of the applicant's driver for which the FIR was registered. And during the interrogation also recovered from the respondents who claimed to have bought the same from a third party. During interrogation and investigation, it was on record that the subject vehicle was subjected to a chase. Whose claimant / defendant initially objected to the supremacy. Vehicle in favor of the applicant, despite repeated notices
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
