Sections 12, 27 (b) and 42 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), section 53 invalidate the specific performance of a pre-sale agreement and the subsequent purchase of a buyer who later claims to be in possession of the buyer. ? The suit land, based on a registered sale agreement that he was an unlawful buyer of the suit land for valuable consideration without prior knowledge of the contract and no valid award for the sale of the immovable property. Will In the last part of section 27 (b) of the Special Relief Act, 1877, the person claiming protection must obtain the knowledge of the contract in advance to be entitled to the property and pay the full cost of the sale. The buyer's statement should not be as described later. Taking notice of the advance agreement will change the scope for the plaintiff to prove that the buyer subsequently received such notice, even if the subsequent contract was voluntarily registered. The buyer shall be entitled to any title or honor or publicity whose title has been obtained under it, whether it is an \ equal right \ or erf incomplete title, therefore, under section 27 (b) of the Special Relief Act, 1877 Defense will not be available to him under. During the cross-examination, the subsequent purchaser acknowledged that he did not pay the seller in full on the sale and there was a balance remaining, after which the buyer secured section 27 (b) of the Special Sales Act 1877 Was not entitled because he did not consider the whole sale. Such a request from the seller was later canceled before the seller learned of the previous contract and later the contract
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
