Section 302 (b) definitions of convincing evidence were fully consistent with the medical evidence, and the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was not scattered in the cross-examination independent certified was not a complex principle, even on uncontested evidence. Can be relied upon. Appreciating the evidence, citing other non-contentious facts, it was always acknowledging the testimony of a witness who was present, unless it was shown that the witness had been falsely deposed. Nothing was identified to exclude the testimony. Each material point was redesigned without any significant contradiction. Eyewitness testimony was permanent and irreversible; all pieces of evidence should be attached so that it should be given a full chain image, which should touch the neck of the deceased in one corner. Failure to link one will destroy the entire chain suspect D. Failure to identify any material contradictions or contradictions that may equate to falsifying the accused's guilt. The ocular testimony was consistent and reliable on all material details, and the relationship of the ocular witnesses with the affected trust late or the accused IPSO would not have a negative response to their truth. In the absence of a motive for a person to be wrongly involved with the commission of a crime, he is interested in prosecuting someone because of my relationship with the deceased or because of the fact that he was an incident. As an interesting witness. In the present case, the incident was accounted for in a natural and reliable manner by eyewitnesses and their b
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
