Section 2 302 / at34 The evidence against the three accused accused of the murder AMd evidence was that he came to the victim's house, called him and went along with no named witnesses who did not see the crime which confirmed that the victim's death was unnatural. ? The dagger was recovered from a sewer near a place that did not automatically connect the suspects without any material evidence, according to the Medical Officer, submitting that his body was killed 3 days before the date of examination. If the accused persons had confessed to their crime before the Investigation Officer, then they were required to present them before the magistrate in order to record their confessional statements, but this was not done by the complaining party in their evidence. What was there was no enmity between them and the accused. There was no motive against the accused for the crime. No evidence was available against any of the accused persons, except for the evidence of the school employee who said the suspect's finger was cut and wrapped in plastic, the defendant informed the witness at that time. Her finger was cut with broken glass while she was painting, but it was not enough for the complainant to add the accused to the commission's statements in her statement that she told the suspects that the victim was a murderer. Suspect, it was not enough to establish the crime of the accused, it was enough to take advantage of the accused, but present There were a number of situations in which the accused had to take advantage, unnatural death of the victim, the fact that the medical evidence itself confirmed, could not shed any light on the identity of the accused.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
