The defendant's admission of proof of the prohibition on section & and (c) narcotic drugs was that since 150 grams of marijuana was dispatched from 15 bundles of weight weighing 15 kg, hence the case of the accused in section 9 (b). Not under section 9 (c) - The Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 was further comparable to that first, 150 grams of hashish and then the rest was sent for chemical inspection and it was positive. Thus, in two installments, the return of marijuana was with a malicious intent and with a final purpose: In view of this second report, it was of no importance in the eyes of the law sent without trial approval. Yes, but on the direction of the District Public Prosecutor's accuracy, for the first time, 150 grams of hashish was sent for chemical testing; the report was positive; in the second phase, the rest of the cannabis was sent for chemical inspection, In this regard, the report was also positive.The lawyer for the accused was unable to show that the accused had ever challenged before a court that there was no drug on the issue of the article, the appellant did not allege. That the recovered item was not a narcotic, there was no reason to interfere with the trial decision
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
