Sections 6, 9 (c), 14 and 15 of the possession of drug paraphernalia were not sealed in the case property and the adviser did not disclose the signatures of any of the ship's personnel. The specimen had no history, nor was it sealed. No form or description of marijuana was specified in the consultation; the FIR was completely silent in case of sample drawing or sending for a single chemical inspection. The Customs Department, which was alleged to have no idea of the weight of the bags that were alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the suspects, whenever suspicion arose, was allowed to recover the goods. There was no mention of the report at the time. , It had to be given to the accused, not as a matter of grace, but full of contradictions in the matter of truth and could not prove the prosecution. Accusations against the accused beyond reasonable doubt The prosecution failed to prove their case against the accused persons, without any reasonable doubt, the accused was acquitted of the charges against them.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
