Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus WALI BHAI INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.

Sections 9 and 10 Bank Debt Recovery Application for leave to defend this case Question of law and fact The defendant admitted to using the financing facility and also acknowledged that the entire obligation was not discharged, However, some payments were also made by the defendants, acknowledging the implementation of the documents and the bank was obliged to pay a substantial amount. There was no specific question raised by the defendants regarding legality and fact, Was required to record any evidence by the court's defendants, demonstrating that the defendant It had paid the bank the entire amount but the defendants failed. Create a question of law or facts that needed to be recorded before the High Court refused to grant leave to defend the defendants' case.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• NELOFAR SAQIB v. SAIBAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS 2011 CLC 157
• Syed MUHAMMAD ARSALAN FAIZ v. State 2011 YLR 158
• FAROOQUE v. State 2011 PCrLJ 158
• MATEEN KAMAL v. State 2011 MLD 159
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary 2011 CLC 162
• MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA KAMAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamab 2011 PLC(CS) 162
• GULSHAN-E-EAISAL, COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LTD. through Secretary v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2011 PLD 163
• UNITED PAPER BOARD AND CONE INDUSTRIES through Partner v. SINDH INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTATE LTD. 2011 YLR 167

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

inheritance advocates near Faisalabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes