Sections 3 363, 4 364A, 9369, 8 468, 202020 and 109 abduction, abduction or abduction of any person under the age of fourteen, for stealing a child under ten from his or her person. Abduction or abduction with intent to commit, fraud, fraud and dishonesty for the purpose of promoting the delivery of property, iftar, where no clear arrangement has been made for his conviction. The only benefit of the suspect was the contents of the passport containing the passport in which the accused was shown the parents of the kidnapped children, saying that there was no recovery of their children or their passports. The outgoing charges were handed over to the principal accused by his parents outside his free will. No evidence was brought on record to show the nexus of the accused / current appellant and principal accused for the commission of the alleged crime. Section 696969, PPC contained the unidentified passports of the alleged kidnappers, which are showing the accused because their parents said that the abductors were not the accused under Section 69369 to link the accused to the commission of the crime. Worthwhile pieces, PPC cannot be punished without credible evidence. The benefit of reasonable doubt should go to the accused. My speculations and probabilities cannot be equivalent to evidence in the absence of a particular character or F Without the nomination and direct credible evidence of the accused in the IR, it would not have been possible to prove an unclean crime Aydh increase, the accused was acquitted of the charges and was sentenced to the trial court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
