Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAZIA versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION KUMB, DISTRICT KHAIRPUR

Section 362 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Petitioner petitioned that the police officers should be prevented from harassing the applicants in any way and instructed them to provide protection to the applicants who were the constituents. Applicants are guaranteed under. The majority and the age of the needy jurist had deposed that they had married her free will and the girl had never been abducted. The girl stated that she did not want to go back to her parents and relatives because they testify about beating her and corrupting her and her husband. On the record it has been proved that the applicant (girl) was of full age and was capable of owning civil and social rights while the girl was majority at the time of her marriage, advocate for parents / relatives. The allegation that the male applicants were influenced or abducted under the girl, or that her marriage was not his will, did not matter to the rich in the opinion of the girl that she was his own She wants to spend the rest of her life with her male applicant

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• KASB BANK LIMITED v. MEKRAN FISHERIES (PVT.) LTD 2011 CLD 484
• ALLAH DITTO v. State 2011 PCrLJ 485
• Qari ALLAH BUX v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 488
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2011 MLD 490
• INDEPENDENT MUSIC GROUP, SMC (PVT) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad 2011 PLD 494
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. Shaikh SHAKEEL AHMED 2011 PTD 495
• MUHAMMAD MASOOD BUTT v. S.M. CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 496
• Mst. SAMINA v. State 2011 PCrLJ 499

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

when you need a advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes