PROF. DR. SURAYYA KHATOON, CHAIRPERSON UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI versus CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI
Sections 4 (p), 14, 21 (a), 23 (2) (y) and 28 (1) (g) of the Higher Education Commission Ordinance (LIII of 2002), Section 10 (i) Constitution of Pakistan Article 199 Constitutional Request Center The University of Plant Conservation has been accused of creating a defendant's appointment as the head of the Center for Response, that the applicant is junior as Head of the Botany Department. That such a center was built without the approval of the Senate. And that the right part of the Botanical Garden and the Herbarium Botany Department should be syndicated because the Executive Body of the University has the authority to respect its affairs and administrative records, which shows that Section 21 (a) of the Karachi Karachi Act 1972 As per the requirement, the Syndicate had approved the formation of such a Center at its meeting and a draft law (Rule) was proposed for Senate approval. During the formation of such Center, the University of Karachi No deviation or violation of section 21 (a) of the Act, 1972 was committed Was established as a department. Completion of students seeking higher education by applying for a directorate degree, which was not previously available to the University for the creation of plants and / or fields, such as the formation of a university, education specialists, students. And was in the best interest of researchers. The applicant, as a member of the University's teaching staff / officer, had no right to interfere with his management's decision to create and object to such a Center for the Advancement of Higher Education. Was not that affected person
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
