Find a Lawyer

SARMAD TUNIO versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Haram bail, further investigation After the arrest of the accused, he was put on an identity test two days after his arrest. The witness was in jail for more than two years before the relevant magistrate made any progress in the case. The case needs further investigation. The time benefitted from this aspect was that the accused, under the circumstances, was admitted on bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ABDUL HAQUE v. A.S.-I. SHER MUHAMMAD 2011 MLD 1270
• GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1273
• NAHEED v. JAMIL AHMAD 2011 YLR 1274
• COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COS-IV, KARACHI v. SASI REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI 2011 PTD 1275
• ANWAR ALI v. MAZHAR HUSSAIN HISBANI 2011 YLR 1279
• BASHIR AHMED v. AL-QADEER HOUSING PROJECT 2011 YLR 1282
• ABDUL KHALIQUE v. State 2011 MLD 1284
• C.I.T. v. B.R.R. INVESTMENT (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 1284

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

pakistani advocates Yazman Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes