Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/435 of the Convention of Martyrs (1984 of 10), Arts 16 and 34, and the Shari'a bail, the only evidence in respect of the grant of further investigation was confession. Which contradicts his earlier stance. And there was no confirmation of confession, which was recorded after a delay of about 2/2 years, the confession of such a partner, without any cooperation, would not be sufficient to record the sentence in this case. The conviction offense, otherwise, was a weak type of evidence and on the basis of such evidence, there were hardly any prospects that would have been helpful in the trial, as the trial court has so far determined in the present case. Did not think that these colleagues, who were changing their version, version, to give conflicting statements after recording, Can be called a witness. Or the sentence may be based on his sole statement requiring investigation / investigation into the accused's case; he was admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
