MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FOR MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Section 2 (b) and 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The dismissal of the misconduct concept on the basis of which the applicant was removed from the job, had the effect that he was competent Was not brought to the notice of authority. Recruitment was banned at Pakistan Steel Mills and the applicant was involved in the accuracy of the Pakistan Steel \ mismanagement due to the absence of vacant posts. Works deceptively with good order or service management. An officer and gentleman should be inactive. Involvement or participation in the industry for a direct or indirect benefit. Misuse or misappropriation of a public office to gain an unfair advantage; and the assumption of financial or other liability for private entities or individuals that could cause embarrassment to the performance of public duties or duties, in the present case, Stability cannot be construed as not indicating recruitment restrictions, as the applicant's mistake was not construed as a 'mismanagement constituent' so as to equate the applicant to death in employment matters. Be condemned if the law passed by any of the departmental authorities In case of violation of law, the High Court can always take action. There was no realistic question in the constitutional petition to correct the misuse of such power as the applicant did not challenge any factual aspect and the order of dismissal of the service against the applicant was set aside and It was ordered to be reinstated. All the resulting benefits
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
