DIVISIONALFOREST OFFICER, LARKANA versus MST. RAJ BIBI
The Appellate Court, under the Civil Procedure Code Sections 42 and 54 (v. 1908), Section 79 and AXLI, R31 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 174 of the Declaration of Suit and Permanent Order of the Prohibition Trial, filed the judgment of the plaintiff of the trial court, Jungle. Dismissed defendant's appeal. The Department claimed ownership and possession of the property on 26th 1887 by the Bombay Gazette Notification. The plaintiff had failed to comply with the provisions of Article 79 of the CPC and Article 174 of the Constitution, requiring that the province be prosecuted in the name of that province by the Secretary. The department but it filed a case against the provincial government through the deputy commissioner, therefore, unable to retain (the forest department) submitted the gazette notification of the Bombay government to show that the land is owned by the forest department Denied the reality of the Gazette notification below. The Appellate Court of Bombay violated the compulsory profession AXLI, R-31, CPC did not offer the points for determination, the plaintiffs did not inspect any of the Department of Revenue and according to the original evidence I failed to receive the tax, the defendants submitted the Gazette notification of the Bombay Government, which was not withdrawn or withdrawn after the Supreme Court of Pakistan issued a decree ordering underground land. Was never available for disposal or cultivation purposes, the Forest Department, the defendants owned their land under the High Court Had rewarding. Plaintiffs' case dismissed by appellate court decision in review petition
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
