Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALI versus STATE

Abduction or abduction to approve Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 364/149, was accepted by the trial court on bail, but the accused was denied bail on that basis. That he was a fugitive cannot be made the basis for dismissing the bail, a bail can be granted if an accused has a good case for bail. And the mere commutation of the bail will not come into effect when the state's lawyer has agreed to approve the accused's bail, according to which it was approved.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• OFFICERS ASSOCIATION T.C.P. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce 2011 CLC 368
• DIVISIONALFOREST OFFICER, LARKANA v. Mst. RAJ BIBI 2011 YLR 371
• ALLIED BANK LTD. v. M. SHAFI 2011 MLD 371
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2011 CLD 373
• PIR BUX v. State 2011 PCrLJ 380
• Mst. SAIQA v. PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, SINDH 2011 CLC 381
• Mst. SHADAB PERVEZ v. Mst. AMBREEN PERVEZ 2011 PLD 382
• Syed HAKIM ALI SHAH v. State 2011 YLR 384

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes