Sections 5 (1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the principle period for transfer of section 24 case \ banking court \ scope financial institution filed a case against the defendants before the banking court and the defendants filed the high court. I requested a transfer. Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Another case filed by the defendants against the Judicial Term / Banking Court in the High Court at the end of Section 5 (3) of the Ordinance 2001, is pending against the bank, eligible for both categories. It was mentioned that the Supreme Court of the Banking Courts was empowered by the Federal Government under section 5 (1) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 to stand trial before its own jurisdiction. Withdraw the case from any banking court. The transfer of cases was equivalent to the High Court's authority contained in Section 24, CPC, allowing the High Court to withdraw any case pending in any subordinate court. E and try or dispose of the suit with the other suit should not be allowed for the trial where the client's request for leave to defend the case was already excluded. Defendant was granted leave in the lawsuit filed by a financial institution and the recording of evidence had not yet begun or was in the preliminary stage, the High Court transferred the case from one banking court to another bank or trial in its own banking jurisdiction. But where the user did not have leave to defend the applicant. The lawsuit filed by the financial institution is still pending
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
