Section 497 (2) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 20 ara Haraba T is liable for fresh bail, granting further investigation because no witness was available in this case, so the property Opposition to the provisions of section 20 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, did not attract the possibility of arrest of the accused without any explanation for any delay after 8 days of holding an identification parade in the case that the police detained the complainant. There was no recovery effect. Allegations against the accused by or on the basis of the indictment appear to be unhealthy, uncertain and generally in nature. The accused, whose case is one of further investigations, was after more than a year of trial. , Which was equal to the sentence before the verdict. To guarantee, in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
