APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus SONERI BANK LIMITED
Section 22 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XLI, R1 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Appeal with certified copy of the order and the decision / order relating to the limitation Approved 4 1 2010 Certified copy of the judgment / decree was made on 23 1 2010, which was prepared on 2 11 2010 and provided to the appellant on 30 2010 10 2010, the date on which the appeal The Respondent's request was filed for removal of appeal Appeal to compliance with the mandatory provisions of OLI, R1, CPC 6 12 2010, by the applicant to file a photocopy of the order and As well as its plight In reply to the reply that the certified copy cannot be obtained due to a misunderstanding between the first appellant staff. Validation of Appellant's Lawyer and Appellant's Lawyer's Appeal Verification According to O XLI, R 1, CPC, each memo of the appellant's signature must be re-appealed or with its applicant. A copy of the order made must be accompanied by a copy. The St. Appellate Court stopped the case on which the decree was established, along with filing a copy of the decision. The appellant had filed a copy of the order along with his reply without filing an application under section 5 of the limitation 1908 for seeking delayed condolences. The trial of arbitration by the High Court to prevent non-compliance with the provisions of the OLLI, R1, CPC, and the delay in filing such a copy will not cause justice, but will be disappointing. ?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011