Section 9 (e) evidence of being a drug lord was apprehended, he was arrested, taking 1700 grants containing 170 sticks, the accused neither denied nor disclosed his possession. That the case presented against the indictment by the prosecution was invalid. And said that the allegations against him were unlawfully dismissed, the trial court provided the accused with ample opportunity to explain his point of view, and nothing in this regard was the defendant's plea. In the address to the special court, it was expressly stated that he confessed to his crime, but only requested the court to sentence him at least because he had minor children. After receiving the aforesaid request, the trial court took some time to consider the matter, but even then its prosecution had not made a decision. In view of the extremely soft doctrine, the trial court of four years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 20,000 had already relaxed the accused with a slight sentence. In the circumstances, there was no case of interference.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
