Section 3, 17 and 22 Companies Ordinance, (XLVII of 1984), Section 290 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The High Court 184 was granted in the form of litigation under the Order of 2001 that the loan to the plaintiff bank After failing to pay, the plaintiff then filed for appeal against the order dated 2 12 2002 and 13 2 2008 filed by the bank for collection of the money received by the applicants / mortgage in 2000 Banking Court. Was presented against the applicants by the statement of the plaintiff showing the cost of his funds by the bank. On the basis of the State Bank of Pakistan's annual financial statement for 2007, petitioners request that in the year 8, 2001, the State Bank fixed such expenditures for the formerly affected plaintiff's funds in the annual absence from 1999. Has done more than illegal and jurisdictional. Financial Statistics (Recovery of Financial Assistance) Since the issuance of the Ordinance 2001, the audited accounts of each year were filed against the applicants by order of termination and consequently 2 12 2002 and 28 5 2003 The two decrees were approved against them, followed by the amendment of the 28 December 2003 Decree 28, 2003, after which the parties were allowed to spend. Applicants did not challenge such orders or orders when the charges against the bank were made, despite the funding, alternative and effective treatment for the plaintiff from the date of the declaration of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001. Will be needed. The recording of the evidence, which cannot be in the constitutional jurisdiction, has been given by the State Bank in its 2007
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
