By applying Section 12 (2) and AXXIII, R 3 Decisions and Decrees separately from fraud and misrepresentation, the applicants claimed that a compromise agreement was approved in favor of the plaintiff, which was fraudulent, false statement by the plaintiff and the defendant. , Was obtained by hiding and suppressing material facts. Together, the applicant was the lawyer of the remaining applicants and in the second case confirmed the preparation of the settlement application and acknowledged the sale of the property in favor of the plaintiff in filing the lawsuit and ordering the settlement. By obtaining a decree, the plaintiff and defendant did not commit any fraud or misrepresentation with the court or the applicants; no fraud in the order and consent decree in favor of the plaintiff by the High Court. The statement and the jurisdiction were not mistaken. The plaintiff and the plaintiff failed to make a case of fraud or misrepresentation against the plaintiff and the defendant, therefore, the High Court refused to interfere with the consent of the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
