Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Article I99 Constitutional Petition The Civil Service Promotion Petition was dismissed only because it had an FIR against it, the Additional Advocate General, in principle, agreed that the matter was decided without merit. The Department can be sent to the Publicity Committee to do so. Whatever the FIR's case against the applicant's case, the authorities were directed to consider the applicant's purely promotion merit promotion case but any criminal or civil case against him. Has no status

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• CHEC-MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (PVT..) LTD. v. ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. 2011 PLD 521
• REZA IQBAL v. ROYAL GROUP 2011 PLD 524
• CHAKAR JAFFARI v. State 2011 MLD 524
• AS ENTERPRISES v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2011 CLD 529
• AHMED v. Miss AISHA TARIQ 2011 CLC 538
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT KARACHI through Deputy Director (Land) 2011 YLR 539
• ABDUL SALAM v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION RATODERO 2011 MLD 540
• ASIF S. SAJAN v. REHAN ASSOCIATES 2011 PLD 542

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Tharparkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes