SAMINA KANWAL versus DIRECTOR PUNJAB FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, FAISALABAD
Section 23 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24A Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Punjab Contract Appointment Policy, 2004, Clause, XVII (i) Intra-Court Appeal Public Policy Civil Service Contract Appointment, Clause The applicant was a contractual employee without termination / assignment without cause and the services were terminated by the authorities under a contract clause whereby the services could be terminated without assigning any reason for the applicant's appointment agreement. Such a clause was opposed to public policy and its breach of section 23, Contract Act of 1872 as well as Section 24A of the General Clause Act, 1897, Punjab. To the extent of the Re-Policy, 2004 - without any reason, Public Policy, Logic to and Good Governance was opposed to Clause XVII (i) of the Punjab Contracting Appointment Policy, 2004 as a humanitarian and non-dignity human dignity and its Due to infringement and put aside period order, the appellant was terminated and declared illegal, and in violation of the Punjab Contract Appointment Policy, the 2004 High Court directed the authorities to comply with the law. Appeal was allowed in the circumstances r \ n circumstances to consider the appellant's case for regularity.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
