Taking advantage of the suspicion of section 2302 (b) / 99 Qatil-e-Amad evidence, the injured witness did not utter a word against the accused in his statement before the trial court, nor did he state that the complainant was his The accompanying accused was at enmity with the accused and the medical evidence was not in line with the secular account offered by him, which further raised suspicion in the case of the prosecution; two co-accused were shot indiscriminately by their names. With the same character, he was acquitted of trial and his evidence could not be traced to the current accused without any strong confrontation. A, which was lacking in the trial under section 342, CRPC, had not been retained by the accused in the affidavit, however, in the absence of any evidence against him. I cannot be regarded as a controversial piece of evidence. Taking advantage of every suspicion, he alleged that the accused was acquitted under circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
