MALIK TARIQ JAVED versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SECTION 30, ISLAMABAD
324/109/506/34 Criminal Pro Cedar Code (V9 1898), High Court Directed Its Name In A Writ Petition Written By The Defendant, Freedom, Criminal Threats In the writ petition filed by the complainant High Court after correction, a new inquiry was ordered in this case. In compliance with this, challan was presented in the court which was named in Column No. 2. I was kept The same trial magistrate subsequently asked the accused to stand trial through an invalid order. The confession of accuracy was that after the High Court order dismissing the accused from the challan, the investigating agency had no right to file challan against him. This, which was a violation of Section 403, CRPC, and Article 13 of the Constitution's accused had never challenged the defamation order before and pursued the trial court proceedings, in which it was regularly It was appearing through his lawyer that otherwise, the writ petition filed by the accused FIR was not revoked and in the absence of any order, only the challan would be corrected to the extent of its name. Was instructed. From the casement, the defendant's name could not be instructed to be removed, limiting the circumstances and the application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
