GULFAM AHMED versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRANWALA
Section 3 was filed against the trial court's sanction of illegal possession of property, in which the private complaint was dismissed by the plaintiff against the applicant in which the applicant / complainant was alleged to have settled. No material particulars of the act were required which were required in the absence of material details, the exact time and date of the alleged disposition act, by the trial court to ascertain whether the complainant under the Unlawful Assignment Act, 2005 Was expelled, no investigations were made, the complainant had already filed an FIR. Once an FIR has been lodged in connection with similar incidents, then the complaint under Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 will not be allowed in connection with the same incident, there was no evidence in the record that the respondents' land. There are properties or antiquated properties of the seizing spirit. Under the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, action was to be taken against persons who were professional Land GRs, not against individuals or members of the Land Mafia, Charged with one act of unlawful destruction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
