CH. AMJAD HUSSAIN versus PUBLIC PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT THROUGH PROSECUTOR-GENERAL, PUNJAB
Section 8 (4) and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 on the basis of the Constitution Petition Agreement and Applicant to terminate the provision of services and Additional Prosecutor General in BS 19 and BS 18 on the basis of agreement in BS 18. Was set for a period of 3 years. On performance-enhancing notification, applicant termination of services, he complained that the notification in the constitutional petition alleging that he was arbitrary petitioners claimed that he was disliked with his services. Notifications will be announced and allowed without legal authority. Continuing its service till the appointment of the permanent officers of the officers was that all the appointments through the initial recruitment in the prosecution service should be implemented under section 8 (4) of the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service (Terms, Duties and Powers) Act. Was. 2006, who made such appointments to be made through selection process by the Punjab Public Service Commission. Applicants were appointed without any selection process from the Public Service Commission. Applicants are appointed on a temporary / contract basis whose rehabilitation policy relates to their position. He said the appointments were only appropriate as a temporary measure and as a stopgap arrangement, as regular recruitment through the Public Service Commission was not only mandatory for recruitment through the Commission but also to ensure transparency and merit. It was necessary to retain the applicants. In the path of early recruitment, he was entitled to retain his positions as long as the public service
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
