Sections 302 (b) (c) and 8 Qat evidence for the increase in conviction for general and domestic abuse charges were not approved by the accused by the investigating officer during the investigation. No defense evidence was presented to prove because the accused had not even set up the alleged incident by him, the prosecutor's version of the prosecutor's evidence occurred inside his home, the Investigation Officer said. Was also endorsed by the defendant's site plan. He did not prepare the victim's house with a deadly weapon, but rather made it worse when he was accused of stabbing the victim as a result of the exchange of abuse between the accused and the victim. Climbed the wall to get into his house, in which case, the result of the abusive exchange between the accused and the victim was the result of sudden provocation, after which the accused took the hatchery lying in the yard of the complainant's house. There was, on the wrong side of the post-mortem injury due to head injury, there was a matter of meditation, rather than a sudden advertisement. Simulation results in dead air again reiterated the suspect did not hurt any of the deceased parties and were not related to each other and eliminate the issue of power any previous animosity between the parties. Demanding self-control at that moment as a result of the exchange of abuse between the accused and the victim, since the accused had no intention of causing the murder D, the act of the accused is equivalent to the amount of criminal murder that does not equal the murder of the accused. The complexity of
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
