Article 199 The Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court has reviewed the decision of the High Court jurisdictional educational institution on the basis that the constitutional petition reviewed the High Court's decision even though there was a patent of error on record. Numbers have not claimed to be exempt from the award. Exam papers which were held outside the curriculum were held, if there was a mistake in the face of the record, the applicant was unlikely to succeed on too many qualifications as the record shows. That the six candidates had appeared in the question and four of the six candidates had passed the paper / examination where the remaining two candidates, including the applicant, did not pass the said test, the other unsuccessful candidate challenged the result. Did not It was only the applicant who had come forward with the complaint that the paper was out of curriculum for the purpose of which the university authorities had scheduled their examinations regularly. University officials themselves also needed to be interpreted. Avoid interpreting it until a case of grave injustice unfolds. The Petitioner had chosen a profession in which he would practice as a doctor even though there is not a doctor who is practicing the profession of medicine, even though a physiotherapist of physiotherapy did not have to keep his details. Knowledge of the syllabus subjects that appear for the vocational examinations could not select or select random subjects because in the practical field
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
