ZAHID SALEEM SANDHU versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Article 199 Punjab University General Regulation, CHIPS VI and VII Constitutional Application Educational Institution Petitioner challenged the University's Disciplinary Committee to cancel its BA Examination Result on using unfair means. Applicants of the same valid application twice, by appearing in the second annual examination of the same year, violating the ban of the same year, deciding to sit in the second annual examination of the first year of the same year. Was cheated. Against her submission in the University Examination for using unfair methods, the applicant issued a notice to the applicant, ignoring the three-year ban, banning the LLB and MA political science exams. But they did not join the proceedings. His innocence was first disclosed by Petty in Chapter VI of the General Regulations. The tuner deals only with matters settled under CIS (2) and (3) of Chapter VII. Whereas the action was taken under CL (1) in Chapter VI of the General Regulations against the applicant, Stady advantage of the individual beneficiaries before provisions Syndicate end result within three years of the announcement of the result in the case of error etc. Not Available for Applicant Petitioner twice accused the University of fraud with fraudulent charges. Applicant's case involves a factual dispute which could not be resolved by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction; the Dispensary Committee followed the procedure before taking the previous decision against the applicant.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
