MST. HIRA REHMAN versus CHANCELLOR, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE UNIVERSITY, LAHORE
Article 199 Constitutional application Exempt from parental jurisdiction of the educational institution, the scope petitioner was studying at the University and was excluded because of the low percentage of his attendance that the plea had raised by the applicant to the University. Should exercise parental jurisdiction in this matter. Was an independent body and had its own rules, the policy and prospectus courts did not interfere with such application because the applicant's case falls within the scope of the working of the University High Court, as raised by the applicant. The requested application could not find any power. He had once enrolled in his class from the university. The applicant's behavior was that he had achieved a low percentage of attending classes during his academic session, while the required percentage was 85% in each subject but that was not the reason why he was not. He took proper care of his specialists and did not even pay tu fees. In case of such failure by a university student, he was responsible for the academic institution being removed from the applicant's list. However, when he himself had not shown any kind of care and concern in his academic career, then there could be no problem. The High Court has shown them in this matter in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the university refuses to interfere in the decision.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
