Find a Lawyer

RAO ABID ALI versus HINA JABBAR

Article 5 and Schedule Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for terminating the marriage and recovering the articles of dowry or gold with jewelry worth Rs 396,250. 'S articles were returned. In the presence of the plaintiff's witnesses, the trial court dismissed the plaintiff's case for the recovery of the dowry articles or the value of Rs 200,000 which was given as a gift, the two parties filed appeals which the appellate court Had excluded by a strong decision. And the defendant's position on returning the injunctive articles was outside the scope of his pleadings. Therefore it cannot be legally deemed that the plaintiff did not present any receipt for the return of the articles to the plaintiff which the plaintiff failed to indicate that he did not read any misunderstanding or material evidence. The decisions and orders of both the courts below the High Court can be affected. Refuses to interfere with constitutional jurisdiction Constitutional petition is barred

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD EJAZ v. State 2011 MLD 367
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2011 YLR 368
• EHSAN ULLAH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN/PAKISTAN RAILWAYS through Chairman 2011 PLC(CS) 371
• Maj. (Rtd.) MUHAMMAD AYYAZ KHAN DURRANI v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLD 372
• Dr. JAVAID SHAHBAZ RAB v. THE STATE through Chairman National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad 2011 PCrLJ 376
• JAMAL AKRAM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2011 PLD 377
• Mst. HIRA REHMAN v. CHANCELLOR, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE UNIVERSITY, LAHORE 2011 CLC 377
• State v. KHURRAM SHAHZAD 2011 MLD 378

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Khair Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes