DR. JAVAID SHAHBAZ RAB versus THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD
Section 15, 25 (b) and 32 words which have been found guilty and are considered to have been bargaining and trial at the request of the accused and discrimination accused were sentenced under section 15 of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999. It was banned from receiving any kind of financing. By any bank or financial institution owned by the government and under the control of the government for ten years, the accused had raised the demand that any accused be different from the sentence imposed after the trial. That any of the accused was declared to be credible in the plea bargain. The National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 was introduced in the criminal law, so that the accused could voluntarily return any of their forward-looking assets or profits obtained or obtained from them, or the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. Providing an opportunity under the circumstances to result in a crime. Another term of conviction and conviction was also meaningful; the same was the case between those who wanted to stand trial and another who decided to fulfill their responsibilities. Adoption of any such interpretation of terms could not be treated the same, the trial court made false statements under the provisions of law and the accused was wrongly banned because of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 As was considered in section 15 (b), the High Court has charged the accused with obtaining financial services from any bank or financial institution. The restrictions limit the trial was sentenced to court. Subsidiaries owned or controlled by the Government Appeal are subject to the same
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
