Section 5 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Appeal to the High Court for the Revision of Sections 115 and 151 Revision, Request for Defamation Delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908, as well as a dismissal for illegal proceedings The petitioners were of the view that none of the applicants were given notice to transfer their case from the circuit bench to the principal seat. Therefore, the application was moved after a delay of two years, nine months and 10 days, which was transferred from the Circuit Bench to the Principal Seat through a notification issued in 2003 and the transfer lawyer moved on 9th 2004 after the transfer. Appeared in the High Court. Matters; He knew that the case had moved. After the hearing, the lawyer sent a written request for postponement and on 8 7 2004 the lawyer appeared before the High Court at the Principal seat. However, on August 30, 2004, the request for a hearing was postponed. The record revealed that a review application was set for hearing on 19 11 2004 and a card was issued to the council for the applicants, according to which there was a 2 11 2004 date note for the date. 19 11 2004 No affidavit was submitted by the applicants - it is advised that he did not receive the office-issued card which he delayed in the 11 11 2004 to the contents of the petition. Did not specify the delay of each and the application limitation Act filed under section 5 of each section, 1908 was not enforceable as well as the contempt of the delay petition along with the restoration application was rejected by the High Court. \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
