Definition of evidence from section ((b) (iii) and possession of 13 weapons) The complainant / police officer alleged that the applicant / accused had been investigated under section 302/324/34, PPC. A knife was found on the suspect's identity during the course of his cross-examination in the presence of witnesses, however, admitting that the alleged knife was recovered from Section 3 (b) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. (iii) According to the definition, available in the market, knives with blades of 4 inches or more will come under the definition of weapons, but kitchen knives or knives that run professionally. Used for good faith, they were specifically excluded from the knife pattern, allegedly due to the trend of the common kitchen knife / knife arms commonly used in every household. Cannot be held by a person, unless a license is issued. The authorized authority, and was punished under Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, where the FIR was proved. Had not happened, the only witness to the recovery had denied the complainant's statement. And most of all, the knife did not fall under the definition of weapons; the conviction and sentence filed by the trial court established by the Court of Appeal was not sustainable in the eyes of the law, the plea of the petitioners has been affected and the conviction. Has been approved by the courts below. Was set aside; and the accused was acquitted and released from jail under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
