SHAHID SIDDIQUE versus SHARJA NATIONAL TRAVELS AND TOURIST AGENCY
Sections 13, 44A, OIX, X13 and OXIIIX Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 588 Ex parte decree reliance mortgaged property, trial court sale defendant Against the previous action and on the basis of which the preliminary injunction was passed. The order was approved in a foreign country and allowed for the sale of property for which a mortgage agreement was made. Nothing on file was available for the property to show that the United Arab Emirates Section 44A.C. Performing a buggy of the area under the concept of PC Definition 2. In the absence of any such notification, the foreign decision in this case could not be finalized under the meaning of section 13, as the area was to be officially declared in the official gazette declaring the official areas as the CP The CK verdict was approved by a court in Dubai and the decree issued there, unless it was established by a separate case in accordance with the terms of section 13, CPC, does not apply to the Pakistan trial court. Can be done Presenting a mortgage agreement, claiming it committed another illegal action, which was in fact a contract by mortgage, such an agreement showed that it was an executive document that contained the form of a mortgage pledge. Was acquired only under mortgage in the forms provided under section 88under. The Transfer Property Act, 1882, was in force through the court, the High Court passed the decision and the decision by the trial court, and the case remanded that the defendant had the opportunity to contest the merit in the same way.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
