After the Section 2 30b (b) / e 34 investigation, the FIR was promptly filed with all the necessary details of the incident, in which case any suggestion or consideration by the complainant Was dismissed, one of the prosecution's witnesses is the real father of the deceased and the other one was Sigma, the presence of two witnesses with the deceased at the time of his presence, which was the victim's shop, was very natural and understandable, There is no reason for the suspect to be lied to by the witnesses and there is no reason to doubt it. Their testimony because they had no enmity with the accused was not enough to discredit my witness or otherwise, in such cases, where the two eyed witnesses were close relatives of the deceased, This was an unusual occurrence because it was impossible that close and near relatives would release the original culprit and turn another person into a murder case. Eyewitnesses and medical evidence were not cleared by chance, the Franzik Science Laboratory reported that the gun was recovered from the accused, the prosecution had no benefit, the prosecution of all the other accomplices would not proceed. Either way they were charged, first of all because their case was so prominent. Since none of them had hurt the deceased. And the fatal injury was only to be blamed. There was no universal application of the second principle of fallacy in the UN at the omnibus. In order to ensure justice, the grain was forced out of hunger; the prosecutor, without any reasonable doubt, was able to prove his case against the accused, accused under section 302 (b).
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
