Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAHIR RASOOL versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH SECRETARY

Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petition The eligibility for promotion of a civil service and eligibility for employee development cannot be subject to a constitutional request and it was the only authorized authority to change the seniority position assigned to an employee unless otherwise There was a question of seniority and promotion terms and the terms of service that fall under the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal and Article 1212 of the Constitution under Article 199 of the Constitution cannot be included in the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• UMAR SHAHZAD alias SHAIB v. State 2011 MLD 326
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 YLR 327
• GHAZANFAR ABBAS v. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (COLLEGES), SIALKOT 2011 PLC(CS) 331
• NAJEEB AHMAD ABBASI v. M.A.G. 2011 PLD 334
• ATIQ-UR-REHMAN v. SAEED ULLAH GONDAL 2011 PLD 336
• PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. through Managing Director v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, F.I.A. ISLAMABAD 2011 YLR 337
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. S.H.O. 2011 MLD 337
• RABART v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MIAN CHANNU, DISTRICT KHANEWAL 2011 PLD 340

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes