Find a Lawyer

GHAZANFAR ABBAS versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (COLLEGES), SIALKOT

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment Service Submission of Applicants Appointed by the competent authority on the recommendations of the department selection committee, after completing all the receipts, the applicants started to perform their duties and accordingly the department Continued to pay monthly salaries and other benefits to applicants. The applicants were terminated merely on the ground that during the process of appointing the applicant ground some irregularities were made on the basis of which the applicant's services were terminated, they were misunderstood because The department could not punish the applicants for punitive errors. By this; and the authority appointed was responsible for overcoming its deficiencies. Action must be taken against the appointing authority for committing malpractice through illegal appointments.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• M. ASLAM MOUVIA v. HOME SECRETARY 2011 PLD 323
• JAFFAR ALI SHAH v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary to the Government of the Punjab Home Department 2011 PLC(CS) 324
• UMAR SHAHZAD alias SHAIB v. State 2011 MLD 326
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 YLR 327
• NAJEEB AHMAD ABBASI v. M.A.G. 2011 PLD 334
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR RASOOL v. PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Secretary 2011 PLC(CS) 334
• ATIQ-UR-REHMAN v. SAEED ULLAH GONDAL 2011 PLD 336
• PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. through Managing Director v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, F.I.A. ISLAMABAD 2011 YLR 337

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

lawer from fb area from Astore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes